Prediction of Roscoe Tanner vs Jim Delaney Head-to-Head, At

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
R. Tanner vs J. Delaney

Roscoe Tanner

USA

4

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Jim Delaney

USA

4

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Head-to-head: Tanner 4 - 0 Delaney

They have played 9 sets in total, with Roscoe Tanner winning 8 and Jim Delaney winning 1. The last match between Roscoe Tanner and Jim Delaney was at the Hong Kong, 05-11-1979, Round: R3, Surface: Hard, with Roscoe Tanner getting the victory 6-0 6-1.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Tanner	4
Delaney	0

Last 4 H2H Matches:

(R3) Hong Kong(11-05-79)

Stats

Roscoe Tanner

Jim Delaney

(R4) San Jose(02-14-77)

Stats

Roscoe Tanner

Jim Delaney

(R3) Perth(10-25-76)

Stats

Roscoe Tanner

Jim Delaney

R. Tanner vs J. Delaney H2H Profile

R. Tanner	Stats	J. Delaney
$0	Career Prize Money	$0
66.67% (604-302)	Career Total W/L	40.85% (96-139)
1	Clay	0
3	Hard	0
17	Titles	1
4	Total H2H Matches	0
0% (0-0)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

R. Tanner vs J. Delaney Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Roscoe Tanner has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Jim Delaney has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Roscoe Tanner, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Jim Delaney has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Roscoe Tanner has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Jim Delaney has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Roscoe Tanner has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Jim Delaney winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Roscoe Tanner has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 73% (W/L 116/42), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 62% (W/L 98/59). Jim Delaney has their best career surface win % on N/A, winning 73% (W/L 1/1), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 37% (W/L 30/52).
Player level: In the last year, Roscoe Tanner has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Jim Delaney has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 4 times before with Roscoe Tanner winning 4 times and Jim Delaney being victorious 0 times. They have played 9 sets in total, with Roscoe Tanner winning 8 and Jim Delaney winning 1.
The last match between Roscoe Tanner and Jim Delaney was at the Hong Kong, 05-11-1979, Round: R3, Surface: Hard, with Roscoe Tanner getting the victory 6-0 6-1.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Roscoe Tanner has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Jim Delaney has played against players with an average rank of 0.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Roscoe Tanner has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Jim Delaney has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Roscoe Tanner has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Jim Delaney has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Roscoe Tanner vs Jim Delaney Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

R. Tanner vs J. Delaney H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

R. Tanner	Stats	J. Delaney
4	H2H Matches Won	0
8	Sets Won	1
55	Games Won	33
0:0:0	Average Match Time	0:0:0
100% (4/4)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	0% (0/4)
100% (1/1)	Deciding Set Win %	0% (0/1)
100% (4/4)	1st Set Won, Won Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/4)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/4)

Recent Performance Stats

R. Tanner Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Memphis - 28-01-1985
R2 Zoltan KuharszkyZ. Kuharszky	L	7-5 6-7 6-4	Stats
Tel Aviv - 10-09-1984
R3 Amos MansdorfA. Mansdorf	L	6-4 7-6	Stats
US Open - 28-08-1984
R1 Matt DoyleM. Doyle	L	6-2 6-2 6-4	Stats
Cincinnati - 20-08-1984
R2 Jimmy ConnorsJ. Connors	L	6-1 6-3	Stats
Columbus - 13-08-1984
R3 Tim GulliksonT. Gullikson	L	5-7 6-2 6-1	Stats

View All

J. Delaney Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Washington - 19-07-1982
R2 Juan AvendanoJ. Avendano	L	6-3 6-2	Stats
Boston - 12-07-1982
R2 Marty DavisM. Davis	W	3-6 7-6 6-4	Stats
R4 Fernando LunaF. Luna	L	6-2 6-0	Stats
R3 Eddie DibbsE. Dibbs	W	7-5 6-2	Stats
Newport - 05-07-1982
R3 John SadriJ. Sadri	L	7-6 7-5	Stats

View All

R. Tanner vs J. Delaney Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

R. Tanner	Stats	J. Delaney
66.67% (604/302)	YTD Win/Loss	40.85% (96/139)
63.03% (1439/844)	Sets Win/Loss	42.93% (249/331)
54.41% (12342/10342)	Games Win/Loss	47.56% (2651/2923)
66.98% (215/106)	Hard Win/Loss	44.59% (33/41)
62.42% (98/59)	Clay Win/Loss	36.59% (30/52)
64.66% (161/88)	Indoor Hard W/L	39.02% (16/25)
73.42% (116/42)	Grass Win/Loss	44.44% (16/20)
1st Match	Average Match Time	1st Match
549.44	Average Opponent Rank	611.03
73.17% (90/33)	Slam W/L	23.53% (4/13)
54.39% (31/26)	Masters W/L	18.18% (2/9)
69.23% (9/4)	Cups W/L	0% (0/0)
66.48% (474/239)	Main Tour W/L	39.78% (72/109)
0% (0/0)	Challenger W/L	69.23% (18/8)
67% (505/759)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	42% (91/216)
67% (90/134)	Best of 5 Sets Win %	19% (3/16)
39% (15/38)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	0% (0/0)
56% (161/288)	Deciding Set Win %	45% (38/85)
86% (596/514)	1st Set Won, Won Match	74% (98/73)
14% (596/82)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	26% (98/25)
28% (299/83)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	18% (137/24)